On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Marc Sturlese <marc.sturl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And what about:
> <fieldtype name="sint" class="solr.SortableIntField"
> sortMissingLast="true"/>
> vs.
> <fieldtype name="bcdint" class="solr.BCDIntField" sortMissingLast="true"/>
>
> Wich is the differenece between both? It's just bcdint always better?
> Thanks in advance

BCDInt was a very early attempt at a sortable int type that didnt go
through binary - it went directly from base 10 (the actual string
representation) to a sortable base 10000 (10K fits in a single char
and saves memory in the fieldCache), and it also had no size limit.
It's no longer referenced in any example schemas, and it doesn't have
support for function queries.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

Reply via email to