Can you run 32-bit Java there?  Will use less memory! :)

Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch



----- Original Message ----
> From: Matthieu Labour <matth...@strateer.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, January 22, 2010 11:07:45 AM
> Subject: Re: performance issue
> 
> Hi
> 
> Thank you for your reponse
> 
> Which version of solr?
> I inherited the project so not exactly sure ... in CHANGES.txt it says
> Apache Solr Version 1.4-dev
> $Id: CHANGES.txt 793090 2009-07-10 19:40:33Z yonik $
> 
> What garbage collection parameters?
> ulimit -n 100000 ; nohup java -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
> -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode  -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+CMSPermGenSweepingEnabled
> -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:-TraceClassUnloading
> -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:ParallelGCThreads=4 -Xmx5000m
> -Dsolr.solr.home=/opt/solr_env/index
> -Djava.util.logging.config.file=/opt/solr_env/index/logging.properties
> -Djetty.host=0.0.0.0 -DSTOP.PORT=8079 -DSTOP.KEY=stop.now
> -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3500
> -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -jar start.jar > solr.log &
> 
> What version of java?
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.5.0_18-b02, mixed mode). I also
> tried with 1.6 but didn't change. Changing -Xmx from 5000 to 3500 causes the
> problem to happen quicker
> 
> The machine is an xlarge machine on amazon
> 
> 7 GB of memory
> 20 EC2 Compute Units (8 virtual cores with 2.5 EC2 Compute Units each)
> 1690 GB of instance storage
> 64-bit platform
> I/O Performance: High
> API name: c1.xlarge
> 
> 
> Thank you for your help
> 
> 
> matt
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> 
> > Which version of Solr? Java? What garbage collection parameters?
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Matthieu Labour 
> > wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I have been requested to look at a solr instance that has been patched
> > with
> > > our own home grown patch to be able to handle 1000 cores on a solr
> > instance
> > >
> > > The solr instance doesn't perform well. Within 12 hours, I can see the
> > > garbage collection taking a lot of time and query & update requests are
> > > timing out (see below )
> > >
> > > [Full GC [PSYoungGen: 673152K->98800K(933888K)] [PSOldGen:
> > > 2389375K->2389375K(2389376K)] 3062527K->2488176K(3323264K) [PSPermGen:
> > > 23681K->23681K(23744K)], 4.0807080 secs] [Times: user=4.08 sys=0.00,
> > > real=4.08 secs]
> > >
> > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
> > > java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
> > >        at
> > >
> > 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer.request(CommonsHttpSolrServer.java:472)
> > >        at
> > >
> > 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer.request(CommonsHttpSolrServer.java:243)
> > >        at
> > >
> > 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.AbstractUpdateRequest.process(AbstractUpdateRequest.java:105)
> > >
> > >
> > > I used yourkit to track down eventual memory leaks but didn't succeed in
> > > finding one
> > >
> > > The biggest objects using up the memory seem to be org.apache.lucene.Term
> > > and org.apache.lucene.TermInfo
> > >
> > > The total size of the data directory in index is 46G with a typical big
> > core
> > > being 100000 documents and size of 103M
> > >
> > > There are lots of search requests and indexing happening
> > >
> > > I am posting to the mailing list hoping to hear that we must be doing
> > > something completely wrong because it doesn't seem to me that we are
> > pushing
> > > the limit. I would appreciate any tips as where to look at etc... to
> > > troubleshoot and solve the issue
> > >
> > > Thank you for your help !
> > >
> > > matt
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Lance Norskog
> > goks...@gmail.com
> >

Reply via email to