On Feb 3, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Erik Hatcher
<erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
One thing I find awkward about convertType is that it is
JdbcDataSource
specific, rather than field-specific. Isn't the current
implementation far
too broad?
it is feature of JdbcdataSource and no other dataSource offers it. we
offer it because JDBC drivers have mechanism to do type conversion
What do you mean by it is too broad?
I mean the convertType flag is not field-specific (or at least field
overridable). Conversions occur on a per-field basis, but the setting
is for the entire data source and thus all fields.
Erik
