That discussion cites a paper via a URL: http://doc.rero.ch/lm.php?url#16;00,43,4,20091218142456-GY/Dolamic_Ljiljana__When_Stopword_Lists_Make_the_Difference_20091218.pdf
Unfortunately when I go to this URL I get: "L'accès à ce document est limité." But I tracked down the paper. Here is its reference (which may require a subscription: sorry): US: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21186 AU: Ljiljana Dolamic AU: Jacques Savoy TI: When stopword lists make the difference SO: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology VL: 61 NO: 1 PG: 200-203 YR: 2010 CP: © 2009 ASIS&T ON: 1532-2890 PN: 1532-2882 AD: Computer Science Department, University of Neuchâtel, 2009 Neuchâtel, Switzerland DOI: 10.1002/asi.21186 -Glen On 17 March 2010 06:02, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> I was reading "Scaling Lucen and Solr" >> (http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Articles/Scaling-Lucene-and-Solr/) >> and I came across the section StopWords. >> >> In there it mentioned that its not recommended to remove >> stop words at index >> time. Why is this the case? Don't all the extraneous >> stopwords bloat the >> index and lead to less relevant results? Can someone please >> explain this to >> me. Thanks > > There were a discussion about stopwords (remove them, not to remove them, or > index them with CommonGramsFilterFactory) and good references in this thread. > > http://search-lucene.com/m/QvJtF1mIPP22/When+Stopword+Lists+Make+the+Difference > > > > -- -
