>>may be this is one very imp feature to be considered for next releases of SOLR.
i agree, is glaringly important. i'm quite suprised that this feature isn't already available. can anyone elaborate on the reason that it isn't available? (out of interest). >>sometimes these kind of cases would come up. very often these type of cases come up! i need to use it now... ! hopefully it'll be available soon. rob ganly 2010/3/4 Kranti™ K K Parisa <kranti.par...@gmail.com> > may be this is one very imp feature to be considered for next releases of > SOLR. sometimes these kind of cases would come up. > > Best Regards, > Kranti K K Parisa > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Andrzej Bialecki <a...@getopt.org> wrote: > > > On 2010-03-04 07:41, Walter Underwood wrote: > > > >> No. --wunder > >> > > > > Or perhaps "not yet" ... > > > > http://portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1458171 > > > > > > > >> On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Kranti™ K K Parisa wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >>> > >>> Is there any way to update the index for only the specific fields? > >>> > >>> Eg: > >>> Index has ONE document consists of 4 fields, F1, F2, F3, F4 > >>> Now I want to update the value of field F2, so if I send the update xml > >>> to > >>> SOLR, can it keep the old field values for F1,F3,F4 and update the new > >>> value > >>> specified for F2? > >>> > >>> Best Regards, > >>> Kranti K K Parisa > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrzej Bialecki <>< > > ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ > > [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web > > ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration > > http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com > > > > >
