nice one! thanks.

>
>> i could be wrong but it seems this
>> way has a performance hit?
>>
>> or i am missing something?
>
> Did you read Chris's message in http://search-lucene.com/m/1o5mEk8DjX1/
> He proposes alternative (more efficient) way other than [* TO *]
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to