BB, Could it be that you are comparing apples and oranges? * Is the hardware identical? * Are indices identical? * Are JVM versions the same? * Are JVM arguments identical? * Are the two boxes "equally idle" when Solr is not running?
* etc. In general, no, there is no reason why Windows would automatically be faster than Linux. Otis ---- Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ ----- Original Message ---- > From: bbarani <bbar...@gmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 5:06:55 PM > Subject: SOLR search performance - Linux vs Windows servers > > Hi, I have SOLR instances running in both Linux / windows server > (same version / same index data). Search performance is good in windows > box compared to Linux box. Some queries takes more than 10 seconds in > Linux box but takes just a second in windows box. Have anyone encountered > this kind of issue before? Thanks, BB -- View this message in > context: > href="http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-search-performance-Linux-vs-Windows-servers-tp901069p901069.html"; > > target=_blank > >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-search-performance-Linux-vs-Windows-servers-tp901069p901069.html Sent > from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
