Blargy - Please try to quote the mail you're responding to, at least
> the relevant piece. It's nice to see some context to the discussion.
No problem ;)
Depends - if you optimize the index on the master, then the entire index is
replicated. If you simply commit and let Lucene take care of adding
segments you'll generally reduce what is replicated.
As a side question... would reducing the mergeFactor help at all? This is
currently what I am using...
<mainIndex>
<useCompoundFile>false</useCompoundFile>
<ramBufferSizeMB>64</ramBufferSizeMB>
<mergeFactor>5</mergeFactor>
<unlockOnStartup>false</unlockOnStartup>
<reopenReaders>true</reopenReaders>
<deletionPolicy class="solr.SolrDeletionPolicy">
<str name="maxCommitsToKeep">1</str>
<str name="maxOptimizedCommitsToKeep">0</str>
</deletionPolicy>
<infoStream file="INFOSTREAM.txt">false</infoStream>
</mainIndex>
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Peformance-tuning-tp904540p904810.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
