Yea, I've had mild success with the highlighting approach with lucene, but wasn't sure if there was another method available from solr.
Thanks Mike. On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > This is a fairly frequently requested and missing feature in Lucene/Solr... > > Lucene actually "knows" this information while it's scoring each > document; it's just that it in no way tries to record that. > > If you will only do this on a few documents (eg the one page of > results) then piggybacking on the highlighter is an OK approach. > > If you need it on more docs than that, then probably you should > customize how your queries are scored to also tally up which docs had > which terms. > > Mike > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Max Lynch <ihas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would like to be search against my index, and then *know* which of a > set > > of given terms were found in each document. > > > > For example, let's say I want to show articles with the word "pizza" or > > "cake" in them, but would like to be able to say which of those two was > > found. I might use this to handle the article differently if it is about > > pizza, or if it is about cake. I understand I can do multiple queries > but I > > would like to avoid that. > > > > One thought I had was to use a highlighter and only return a fragment > with > > the highlighted word, but I'm not sure how to do this with the various > > highlighting options. > > > > Is there a way? > > > > Thanks. > > >
