Compound types are young and will probably mutate. I will do my own hack until things settle down.
Lance On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Mark Allan <mark.al...@ed.ac.uk> wrote: > On 7 Jul 2010, at 6:24 pm, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> Originally, I had intended that it was just for one Field Sub Type, >>> thinking that if we ever wanted multiple sub types, that a new, separate >>> class would be needed >> >> >> Right - this was my original thinking too. Â AbstractSubTypeFieldType >> is only a convenience class to create compound types... people can do >> it other ways. > > Just for clarification, does that mean my modifications won't be included? > Â If so, can you let me know so that I can extract the changes and maintain > them in a different package structure from the main Solr code please. > > Cheers > Mark > > -- > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > > -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
