Adding &debugQuery=on produced the following:
<str name="rawquerystring">+edge:testing +edge:lots</str>
<str name="querystring">+edge:testing +edge:lots</str>
<str name="parsedquery">
+PhraseQuery(edge:"te tes test testi testin testing")
+PhraseQuery(edge:"lo lot lots")
So one part of the answer is that multiple terms are broken up into multiple
phrase
queries, one phrase for each term. This is with LowerCaseTokenizerFactory
and
EdgeNGramFilterFactory
So I don't see any reason why your query shouldn't work. Could you provide
your
field type definitions, an example document that you think should be found
and query output with &debugQuery=on?
Best
Erick
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Luke,
>
> Thanks. What happens if there are 3 terms? It seems like the entire
> query can go into facet.prefix?
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Luke Tebbs <l...@staffing-systems.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > What about if you do something like this? -
> >
> >
> facet=true&facet.mincount=1&q=apple&facet.limit=10&facet.prefix=mou&facet.field=term_suggest&qt=basic&wt=javabin&rows=0&version=1
> >
> >
> > Jason Rutherglen wrote:
> >>
> >> To clarify, the query analyzer returns that. Variations such as
> >> "apple mou" also do not return anything. Maybe Jay can comment and
> >> then we can amend the article?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Jason Rutherglen
> >> <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Analysis returns "app mou".
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What does analysis.jsp show?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Jason Rutherglen
> >>>> <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
> >>>>> here:
> >>>>>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That is one word queries q=app on the query_text field, work fine
> >>>>> however "q=app mou" do not. Why would this be or is there a
> >>>>> configuration that could be missing?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Eric Grobler
> >>>>> <impalah...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for your feedback Robert,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I will try that and see how Solr performs on my data - I think I
> will
> >>>>>> create
> >>>>>> a field that contains only important key/product terms from the
> text.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Johan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Robert Petersen <rober...@buy.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We don't have that many, just a hundred thousand, and solr response
> >>>>>>> times (since the index's docs are small and not complex) are logged
> >>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>> typically 1 ms if not 0 ms. It's funny but sometimes it is so fast
> >>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>> milliseconds have elapsed. Incredible if you ask me... :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Once you get SOLR to consider the whole phrase as just one big
> term,
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> wildcard is very fast.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>> From: Eric Grobler [mailto:impalah...@googlemail.com]
> >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:35 PM
> >>>>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Auto Suggest
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Interesting approach, how many documents do you have in Solr?
> >>>>>>> I have about 2 million and I just wonder if it might be a bit slow.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> Johan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Robert Petersen <rober...@buy.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I do this by replacing the spaces with a '%' in a separate search
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> which is not parsed nor tokenized and then you can wildcard across
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> whole phrase like you want and the spaces don't mess you up. Just
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> store
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the original phrase with spaces in a separate field for returning
> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> front end for display.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: Jazz Globe [mailto:jazzgl...@hotmail.com]
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:33 AM
> >>>>>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Auto Suggest
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hallo
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How would one implement a multiple term auto-suggest feature in
> Solr
> >>>>>>>> that is filter sensitive?
> >>>>>>>> For example, a user enters :
> >>>>>>>> "mp3"
> >>>>>>>> and solr might suggest:
> >>>>>>>> -> "mp3 player"
> >>>>>>>> -> "mp3 nano"
> >>>>>>>> -> "mp3 sony"
> >>>>>>>> and then the user starts the second word :
> >>>>>>>> "mp3 n"
> >>>>>>>> and that narrows it down to:
> >>>>>>>> -> "mp3 nano"
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I had a quick look at the Terms Component.
> >>>>>>>> I suppose it just returns term totals for the entire index and
> >>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> used with a filter or query?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>> Johan
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Lance Norskog
> >>>> goks...@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
>
