http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=slop&fullsearch=Text
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Dennis Gearon <gear...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > HOw does one 'vary the slop'? > > Dennis Gearon > > Signature Warning > ---------------- > EARTH has a Right To Life, > otherwise we all die. > > Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded' > Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php > > > --- On Fri, 9/17/10, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: Can i do relavence and sorting together? >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Date: Friday, September 17, 2010, 8:58 AM >> The problem, and it's a practical >> one, is that terms usually have to be >> pretty >> close to each other for proximity to matter, and you can >> get this with >> phrase queries by varying the slop. >> >> FWIW >> Erick >> >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Cogan >> <aco...@wordsearchbible.com>wrote: >> >> > I'm a total Lucene/SOLR newbie, and I'm surprised to >> see that when there >> > are >> > multiple search terms, term proximity isn't part of >> the scoring process. >> > Has >> > anyone on the list done custom scoring that weights >> proximity? >> > >> > Andy Cogan >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: kenf_nc [mailto:ken.fos...@realestate.com] >> > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:06 AM >> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Can i do relavence and sorting together? >> > >> > >> > Those are at least 3 different questions. Easiest >> first, sorting. >> > add >> &sort=ad_post_date+desc (or asc) >> for sorting on date, >> > descending or ascending >> > >> > check out how >> > http://www.supermind.org/blog/378/lucene-scoring-for-dummies >> > Lucene scores by default. It might close to what >> you want. The only thing >> > it isn't doing that you are looking for is the >> relative distance between >> > keywords in a document. >> > >> > You can add a boost to the ad_title and ad_description >> fields to make them >> > more important to your search. >> > >> > My guess is, although I haven't done this myself, the >> default Scoring >> > algorithm can be augmented or replaced with your own. >> That may be a route >> > to >> > take if you are comfortable with java. >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> > >> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-i-do-relavence-and-sorting-together-t >> > p1516587p1516691.html >> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> > >> > >> > -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
