Thx. I will let you know the latest status. >From: Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> >Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, newsam <new...@zju.edu.cn> >Subject: Re: Re:The search response time is too loong >Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:34:53 -0700 > >Copy the index. Delete half of the documents. Optimize. >Copy the index. Delete the other half of the documents. Optimize. > >2010/9/28 newsam : >> I guess you are correct. We used the default SOLR cache configuration. I >> will change the cache configuration. >> >> BTW, I want to deploy several shards from the existing 8G index file, such >> as 4G per shards. Is there any tool to generate two shards from one 8G index >> file? >> >>>From: kenf_nc
>>>Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>>Subject: Re: Re:The search response time is too loong >>>Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:37:25 -0700 (PDT) >>> >>> >>>"mem usage is over 400M", do you mean Tomcat mem size? If you don't give your >>>cache sizes enough room to grow you will choke the performance. You should >>>adjust your Tomcat settings to let the cache grow to at least 1GB or better >>>would be 2GB. You may also want to look into >>>http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching warming the cache to make the first >>>time call a little faster. >>> >>>For comparison, I also have about 8GB in my index but only 2.8 million >>>documents. My search query times on a smaller box than you specify are 6533 >>>milliseconds on an unwarmed (newly rebooted) instance. >>>-- >>>View this message in context: >>>http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-The-search-response-time-is-too-loong-tp1587395p1588554.html >>>Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> > > > >-- >Lance Norskog >goks...@gmail.com >
