I haven't yet but I was going to use the spell checker in the lucene contrib module. That spellchecker is ngram based and previously I have noticed that I get better results from ngram based spellcheck rather than fuzzy string match based ones.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Xin Li <x...@book.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for a quick solution to improve a search engine's spell > checking performance. I was wondering if anyone tried to integrate Google > SpellCheck API with Solr search engine (if possible). Google spellcheck came > to my mind because of two reasons. First, it is costly to clean up the data > to be used as spell check baseline. Secondly, google probably has the most > complete set of misspelled search terms. That's why I would like to know if > it is a feasible way to go. > > Thanks, > Xin > This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or > may be CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE > PROTECTED > BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended only for the use of > the > addressee(s) named herein. If you are not an intended recipient, > please contact the sender immediately and take the steps > necessary > to delete the message completely from your computer system. > > Not Intended as a Substitute for a Writing: Notwithstanding the > Uniform Electronic Transaction Act or any other law of similar > effect, absent an express statement to the contrary, this e-mail > message, its contents, and any attachments hereto are not > intended > to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and > are not otherwise intended to bind this sender, > barnesandnoble.com > llc, barnesandnoble.com inc. or any other person or entity. >
