strange..are you absolutely sure the two queries are directed to the same
Solr instance? I'm running the same query from the admin page (which
specifies the xml format) and I get the exact same results as solrj.
On 21 October 2010 22:25, Mike Sokolov <soko...@ifactory.com> wrote:
> quick follow-up: I also notice that the query from solrj gets version=1,
> whereas the admin webapp puts version=2.2 on the query string, although this
> param doesn't seem to change the xml results at all. Does this indicate an
> older version of solrj perhaps?
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On 10/21/2010 04:47 PM, Mike Sokolov wrote:
>
>> I'm experiencing something really weird: I get different results depending
>> on whether I specify wt=javabin, and retrieve using SolrJ, or wt=xml. I
>> spent quite a while staring at query params to make sure everything else is
>> the same, and they do seem to be. At first I thought the problem related to
>> the javabin format change that has been talked about recently, but I am
>> using solr 1.4.0 and solrj 1.4.0.
>>
>> Notice in the two entries that the wt param is different and the hits
>> result count is different.
>>
>> Oct 21, 2010 4:22:19 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
>> INFO: [bopp.ba] webapp=/solr path=/select/
>> params={wt=xml&rows=20&start=0&facet=true&facet.field=ref_taxid_ms&q=*:*&fl=uri,meta_ss&version=1}
>> hits=261 status=0 QTime=1
>> Oct 21, 2010 4:22:28 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
>> INFO: [bopp.ba] webapp=/solr path=/select
>> params={wt=javabin&rows=20&start=0&facet=true&facet.field=ref_taxid_ms&q=*:*&fl=uri,meta_ss&version=1}
>> hits=57 status=0 QTime=0
>>
>>
>> The xml format results seem to be the correct ones. So one thought I had
>> is that I could somehow fall back to using xml format in solrj, but I tried
>> SolrQuery.set('wt','xml') and that didn't have the desired effect (I get
>> '&wt=javabin&wt=javabin' in the log - ie the param is repeated, but still
>> javabin).
>>
>>
>> Am I crazy? Is this a known issue?
>>
>> Thanks for any suggestions
>>
>>
