Jonathan, thanks for your statement. In fact, you are quite right: A lot of people developed great caching mechanisms. However, the solution I got in mind was something like an HTTP-Cache - in most cases on the same box.
I talked to some experts who told me that Squid would be a relatively large monster, since we only want him for http-caching. Do you know any benchmarks about responses per second, if most of the queried data is in the cache? Regards -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-cache-or-to-not-cache-tp1875289p1881714.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
