I read it somewhere (sorry for not remembering the source).. the indexversion command gets the "replicable" index version #. Since it is a slave machine, so the result is 0.
Thanks, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io> wrote: > But why? I'd expect valid version numbers although the replication handler's > source code seems to agree with you judging from the comments. > > On Monday 06 December 2010 17:49:16 Xin Li wrote: >> I think this is expected behavior. You have to issue the "details" >> command to get the real indexversion for slave machines. >> >> Thanks, >> Xin >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Markus Jelsma >> >> <markus.jel...@openindex.io> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > The indexversion command in the replicationHandler on slave nodes returns >> > 0 for indexversion and generation while the details command does return >> > the correct information. I haven't found an existing ticket on this one >> > although https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1573 has >> > similarities. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > -- >> > Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17 >> > 050-8536620 / 06-50258350 > > -- > Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex > http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17 > 050-8536620 / 06-50258350 >
