That smells like: http://www.jteam.nl/news/spatialsolr.html

> My partner is using a publicly available plugin for GeoSpatial. It is used
> both during indexing and during search. It forms some kind of gridding
> system and puts 10 fields per row related to that. Doing a Radius search
> (vs a bounding box search which is faster in almost all cases in all
> GeoSpatial query systems) seems pretty fast. GeoSpatial was our project's
> constraint. We've moved past that now.
> 
> Did I mention that it returns distance from the center of the radius based
> on units supplied in the query?
> 
> I would tell you what the plugin is, but in our division of labor, I have
> kept that out of my short term memory. You can contact him at:
> Danilo Unite <danilo.un...@gmail.com>;
> 
> Dennis Gearon
> 
> 
> Signature Warning
> ----------------
> It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
> better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make
> them yourself. from
> 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
> 
> 
> EARTH has a Right To Life,
> otherwise we all die.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: George Anthony <pa...@rogers.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, December 10, 2010 9:23:18 AM
> Subject: SOLR geospatial
> 
> In looking at some of the docs support for geospatial search.
> 
> I see this functionality is mostly scheduled for upcoming release 4.0 (with
> some
> 
> playing around with backported code).
> 
> 
> I note the support for the bounding box filter, but will "bounding box" be
> one of the supported *data* types for use with this filter?  For example,
> if my lat/long data describes the "footprint" of a map, I'm curious if
> that type of coordinate data can be used by the bounding box filter (or in
> any other way for similar limiting/filtering capability). I see it can
> work with point type data but curious about functionality with bounding
> box type data (in contrast to simple point lat/long data).
> 
> Thanks,
> George

Reply via email to