Then you probably want to consider simply flattening the data and storing the relevant data with a single schema. If that doesn't work for you, there is a limited join capability going into the trunk, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272
Best Erick On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Damien Fontaine <dfonta...@rosebud.fr>wrote: > Ok, but i need a relation beetween the two type of document for faceting on > label field. > > Damien > > Le 18/01/2011 18:55, Geert-Jan Brits a écrit : > > Schemas are very differents, i can't group them. >>>> >>> In contrast to what you're saying above, you may rethink the option of >> combining both type of documents in a single core. >> It's a perfectly valid approach to combine heteregenous documents in a >> single core in Solr. (and use a specific field -say 'type'- to >> distinguish >> between them when needed) >> >> Geert-Jan >> >> 2011/1/18 Jonathan Rochkind<rochk...@jhu.edu> >> >> Solr can't do that. Two cores are two seperate cores, you have to do two >>> seperate queries, and get two seperate result sets. >>> >>> Solr is not an rdbms. >>> >>> >>> On 1/18/2011 12:24 PM, Damien Fontaine wrote: >>> >>> I want execute this query : >>>> >>>> Schema 1 : >>>> <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" >>>> required="true" /> >>>> <field name="title" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" >>>> required="true" /> >>>> <field name="UUID_location" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" >>>> required="true" /> >>>> >>>> Schema 2 : >>>> <field name="UUID_location" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" >>>> required="true" /> >>>> <field name="label" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" >>>> required="true" /> >>>> <field name="type" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" >>>> required="true" /> >>>> >>>> Query : >>>> >>>> >>>> select?facet=true&fl=title&q=title:*&facet.field=UUID_location&rows=10&qt=standard >>>> >>>> Result : >>>> >>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >>>> <response> >>>> <lst name="responseHeader"> >>>> <int name="status">0</int> >>>> <int name="QTime">0</int> >>>> <lst name="params"> >>>> <str name="facet">true</str> >>>> <str name="fl">title</str> >>>> <str name="q">title:*</str> >>>> <str name="facet.field">UUID_location</str> >>>> <str name="qt">standard</str> >>>> </lst> >>>> </lst> >>>> <result name="response" numFound="1889" start="0"> >>>> <doc> >>>> <str name="title">titre 1</str> >>>> </doc> >>>> <doc> >>>> <str name="title">Titre 2</str> >>>> </doc> >>>> </result> >>>> <lst name="facet_counts"> >>>> <lst name="facet_queries"/> >>>> <lst name="facet_fields"> >>>> <lst name="UUID_location"> >>>> <int name="Japan">998</int> >>>> <int name="China">891</int> >>>> </lst> >>>> </lst> >>>> <lst name="facet_dates"/>< >>>> /lst> >>>> </response> >>>> >>>> Le 18/01/2011 17:55, Stefan Matheis a écrit : >>>> >>>> Okay .. and .. now .. you're trying to do what? perhaps you could give >>>>> us >>>>> an >>>>> example, w/ real data .. sample queries& - results. >>>>> because actually i cannot imagine what you want to achieve, sorry >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Damien Fontaine<dfonta...@rosebud.fr >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> On my first schema, there are informations about a document like >>>>> title, >>>>> >>>>>> lead, text etc and many UUID(each UUID is a taxon's ID) >>>>>> My second schema contains my taxonomies with auto-complete and facets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 18/01/2011 17:06, Stefan Matheis a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Search on two cores but combine the results afterwards to present >>>>>> them >>>>>> in >>>>>> >>>>>> one group, or what exactly are you trying to do Damien? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Damien Fontaine< >>>>>>> dfonta...@rosebud.fr >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like make a search on two core with differents schemas. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sample : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Schema Core1 >>>>>>>> - ID >>>>>>>> - Label >>>>>>>> - IDTaxon >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Schema Core2 >>>>>>>> - IDTaxon >>>>>>>> - Label >>>>>>>> - Hierarchy >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Schemas are very differents, i can't group them. Have you an idea to >>>>>>>> realize this search ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Damien >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >
