Thanks Lance, I'll see what I can do with 3.x. I got the latest build #260 from Hudson (apache-solr-3.1-2011-02-13_05-19-21.tgz).
While SolrJ 1.4.1 was available to my Maven build, I don't see any 3.x or 4.x client artifacts available out there. It looks like Maven was addressed a while back (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-586), but has that fallen by the wayside? I admittedly did not build from source. But, in the distribution I just downloaded, I don't see any POMs etc. for the client stuff that I could perhaps install in a local repo. Cheers, Jeff On Feb 12, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > There is momentum towards doing a release of 3.x. I would be > comfortable using the 3.x branch. > > --- But I'm unable to get SolrJ to work due to the 'javabin' version > mismatch. I'm using the 1.4.1 version of SolrJ, but I always get an > HTTP response code of 200, but the return entity is simply a null > byte, which does not match the version number of 1 defined in Solr > common. --- > > I've never seen this problem. At this point you are better off > starting with 3.x instead of chasing this problem down. > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Jeff Schmidt <j...@535consulting.com> wrote: >> Hello: >> >> I'm working on incorporating Solr into a SaaS based life sciences semantic >> search project. This will be released in about six months. I'm trying to >> determine which version of Solr makes the most sense. When going to the Solr >> download page, there are 1.3.0, 1.4.0, and 1.4.1. I've been using 1.4.1 >> while going through some examples in my Packt book ("Solr 1.4 Enterprise >> Search Server"). >> >> But, I also see that Solr 3.1 and 4.0 are in the works. According to: >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aroadmap-panel >> >> there is a high degree of progress on both of those releases; including a >> slew of bug fixes, new features, performance enhancements etc. Should I be >> making use of one of the newer versions? The hierarchical faceting seems >> like it could be quite useful. Are there any guesses on when either 3.1 or >> 4.0 will be officially released? >> >> So far, 1.4.1 has been good. But I'm unable to get SolrJ to work due to the >> 'javabin' version mismatch. I'm using the 1.4.1 version of SolrJ, but I >> always get an HTTP response code of 200, but the return entity is simply a >> null byte, which does not match the version number of 1 defined in Solr >> common. Anyway, I can follow up on that issue if 1.4.1 is still the most >> appropriate version to use these days. Otherwise, I'll try again with >> whatever version you suggest. >> >> Thanks a lot! >> >> Jeff >> -- >> Jeff Schmidt >> 535 Consulting >> j...@535consulting.com >> (650) 423-1068 >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Lance Norskog > goks...@gmail.com -- Jeff Schmidt 535 Consulting j...@535consulting.com (650) 423-1068 http://www.535consulting.com
