Jan,
So you are implying that the fields made by copyField are not processed by
UpdateProcessors, right?

Erik,
Logically this makes sense but then copyField operations must move to
solrconfig.xml?

Editing solrconfig.xml is more challenging than schema.xml, I feel.

Kuro

On 2/23/11 2:09 AM, "Erik Hatcher" <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Maybe copy fields should be refactored to happen in a new, core, update
>processor, so there is nothing special/awkward about them?  It seems they
>fit as part of what an update processor is all about,
>augmenting/modifying incoming documents.
>
>    Erik
>
>On Feb 23, 2011, at 04:40 , Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
>> This is how I've got it:
>> 
>> A document first passes through the UpdateChain (processors), which is
>>document centric.
>> Then copyFields are processed
>> And finally the analysis in fieldTypes are processed
>> 
>> So you cannot use <copyField> before UpdateProcessors nor after
>>Analysis :(
>> 
>> --
>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>> 
>> On 23. feb. 2011, at 09.45, Markus Jelsma wrote:
>> 
>>> You are right, i misread. Fields a copied first, then analyzed and
>>>then behave 
>>> like other fields and pass the same way through the update processor.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>>> Markus,
>>>> 
>>>> I searched but I couldn't find a definite answer, so I posted this
>>>> question.
>>>> The article you quoted talks about implementing a copyField-like
>>>>operation
>>>> using UpdateProcessor.  It doesn't talk about relationship between
>>>> the copyField operation proper and UpdateProcessors.
>>>> 
>>>> Kuro
>>>> 
>>>> On 2/22/11 3:00 PM, "Markus Jelsma" <markus.jel...@openindex.io>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> Yes. But did you actually search the mailing list or Solr's wiki? I
>>>>>guess
>>>>> not.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here it is:
>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can fields created by copyField instructions be processed by
>>>>>> UpdateProcessors?
>>>>>> Or only raw input fields can?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So far my experiment is suggesting the latter.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> T. "Kuro" Kurosaka
>> 
>

Reply via email to