They're all set to LC. I was just coming up with a safe example to post.
It sounds like you don't see an issue with the syntax we're using? Thanks tjpoe wrote: > > i noticed that your search terms are using caps vs lower case, are your > search fields perhaps not set to lowercase the terms and/or the search > term? > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, mrw <mikerobertsw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Say I have an index with first_name and last_name fields, and also a copy >> field for the full name called full_name. Say I add two employees: >> Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon Dynamite. >> >> If I search for just the first or last name, or both names, with mm=1, I >> get >> the expected results: >> >> q=Napoleon&defType=dismax&tie=0.1&qf=first_name%20last_name&mm=1 // >> 2 >> results >> q=Bonaparte&defType=dismax&tie=0.1&qf=first_name%20last_name&mm=1 // >> 2 >> results >> >> q=Napoleon%20Bonaparte&defType=dismax&tie=0.1&qf=first_name%20last_name&mm=1 >> // 2 results >> >> >> However, if I try to search for both names with mm=2 (which I think means >> term1 AND term2), I get 0 results: >> >> >> q=napoleon%20bonaparte&defType=dismax&tie=0.1&qf=first_name%20last_name&mm=2 >> // 0 results >> q=napoleon%20bonaparte&defType=dismax&tie=0.1&qf=full_name&mm=2 // 0 >> results >> >> I also see this when I put all fields (including the copy field) into the >> qf >> parameter. >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2596768.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2597447.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
