Have you looked at solr sharding?

Best
Erick

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Sean Bigdatafun
<sean.bigdata...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks, David.
>
> I am thinking of a scenario that billions of objects, whose indices are too
> big for a single machine to serve the indexing, to serve the querying. Is
> there any sharding mechanism?
>
>
> Can you give a comparison between solr-based geospatial search and PostGIS
> based geospatial search?
>          * scalability
>          * functionality richness
>          * incremental indexing (re-indexing) cost
>          * query cost
>          * sharding scheme support
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:42 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) <
> dsmi...@mitre.org
> > wrote:
>
> > Sean,
> >    Geospatial search in Lucene/Solr is of course implemented based on
> > Lucene's underlying index technology. That technology was originally just
> > for text but it's been adapted very successfully for numerics and
> querying
> > ranges too. The only mature geospatial field type in Solr 3.1 is
> LatLonType
> > which under the hood is simply a pair of latitude & longitude numeric
> > fields.  There really isn't anything sophisticated (geospatially
> speaking)
> > in Solr 3.1. I'm not sure what sort of geospatial DB research you have in
> > mind but I would expect other systems would be free to use an indexing
> > strategy designed for spatial such as "R-Trees". Nevertheless, I think
> > Lucene offers the underlying primitives to compete with systems using
> other
> > technologies.  Case in point is my patch SOLR-2155 which indexes a single
> > point in the form of a "geohash" at multiple resolutions (geohash lengths
> > AKA spatial prefixes / grids) and uses a recursive algorithm to
> efficiently
> > query an arbitrary shape.  It's quite fast and bests LatLonType already;
> > and
> > there's a lot more I can do to make it faster.
> >    This is definitely a field of interest and a growing one in the
> > Lucene/Solr community.  There are even some external spatial providers
> > (JTeam, MetaCarta) and I'm partnering with other individuals to create a
> > new
> > one.  Expect to see more in the coming months.  If you're looking for
> some
> > specific geospatial capabilities then let us know.
> >
> > ~ David Smiley
> > Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/
> >
> > -----
> >  Author: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/difference-between-geospatial-search-from-database-angle-and-from-solr-angle-tp2788442p2788972.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --Sean
>

Reply via email to