Which version of solr are you using ? NGrams could be an option but could you give us the field definition in your schema ? The words count in this field index ?
Ludovic. 2011/4/10 Ueland [via Lucene] < ml-node+2802561-121096623-383...@n3.nabble.com> > Hi! > > I have been doing some testing with solr and wildcards. Queries like: > > - *foo > - foo* > > Does complete quickly(1-2s) in a test index on about 40-50GB. > > But when i try to do a search for *foo*, the search time can without any > trouble come upwards for 30seconds plus. > > Any ideas on how that issue can be worked around? > > One fix would be to change *foo* to (*foo or foo* or oof* or *oof) (is the > reverse even needed?). But that will not give the same results as *foo*, > logicly enough. > > I have also tried to set maxTimeAllowed, but that is simply ignored. I > guess that is related to either sorting or the wildcard search itself. > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-with-search-terms-starting-and-ending-with-wildcards-tp2802561p2802561.html > To start a new topic under Solr - User, email > ml-node+472068-1765922688-383...@n3.nabble.com > To unsubscribe from Solr - User, click > here<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=472068&code=Ym91dHJvc2xAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ3MjA2OHw0Mzk2MDUxNjE=>. > > ----- Jouve France. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-with-search-terms-starting-and-ending-with-wildcards-tp2802561p2802579.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
