That's good news -- thanks for the help (not to mention the reassurance that Solr itself is actually working right)! Hopefully 3.1.1 won't be too far off, though; when the analysis tool lies, life can get very confusing! :-)
- Demian > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 2:54 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com > Subject: Re: Bug in solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory? > > No, this is only a bug in analysis.jsp. > > you can see this by comparing analysis.jsp's "dontstems bees" to using > the query debug interface: > <lst name="debug"> > <str name="rawquerystring">"dontstems bees"</str> > <str name="querystring">"dontstems bees"</str> > <str name="parsedquery">PhraseQuery(text:"dontstems bee")</str> > <str name="parsedquery_toString">text:"dontstems bee"</str> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Demian Katz > <demian.k...@villanova.edu> wrote: > >> I've just started experimenting with the > solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory in Solr 3.1, and I'm seeing some > strange behavior. It seems that every word subsequent to a protected > word is also treated as being protected. > > > > You're right! This was broken by LUCENE-2901 back in Jan. > > I've opened this issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3039 > > > > The easiest short-term workaround for you would probably be to create > > a custom filter that looks like KeywordMarkerFilter before the > > LUCENE-2901 change. > > > > -Yonik > > http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May > > 25-26, San Francisco > >