Ok, thanks
On Friday, April 22, 2011, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ofer Fort <o...@tra.cx> wrote: >> Ok, I'll give it a try, as this is a server I am willing to risk. >> How is the competability between solrj of bulkpostings, trunk, 3.1 and 1.4.1? > > bulkpostings, trunk, and 3.1 should all be relatively solrj > compatible. But the SolrJ javabin format (used by default for > queries) changed for strings between 1.4.1 and 3.1 (SOLR-2034). > > -Yonik > http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May > 25-26, San Francisco > > >> On Friday, April 22, 2011, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Ofer Fort <o...@tra.cx> wrote: >>>> So I'm guessing my best approach now would be to test trunk, and hope >>>> that as 3.1 cut the performance in half, trunk will do the same >>> >>> Trunk prob won't be much better... but the bulkpostings branch >>> possibly could be. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May >>> 25-26, San Francisco >>> >>>> Thanks for the info >>>> Ofer >>>> >>>> On Friday, April 22, 2011, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Ofer Fort <o...@tra.cx> wrote: >>>>>> Well, it was worth the try;-) >>>>>> But will using the facet.method=fc, will reducing the subset size >>>>>> reduce the time and memory? Meaning is it an O( ndocs of the set)? >>>>> >>>>> facet.method=fc builds a multi-valued fieldcache like structure >>>>> (UnInvertedField) the first time, that >>>>> is used for counting facets for all subsequent requests. So the >>>>> faceting time (after the first time) is O(ndocs of the set), >>>>> but the UnInvertedField singleton uses a large amout of memory >>>>> unrelated to any particular base docset. >>>>> >>>>> -Yonik >>>>> http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May >>>>> 25-26, San Francisco >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2011, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ofer Fort <o...@tra.cx> wrote: >>>>>>>> So if i want to use the facet.method=fc, is there a way to speed it >>>>>>>> up? and >>>>>>>> remove the bucket size limitation? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not really - else we would have done it already ;-) >>>>>>> We don't really have great methods for faceting on full-text fields >>>>>>> (as opposed to shorter meta-data fields) today. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Yonik >>>>>>> http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May >>>>>>> 25-26, San Francisco >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
