Any thoughts on this one? Why does Solr output a string in a long field with XMLResponseWriter but fails doing so (as it should) with the javabin format?
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 10:52:33 Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hi, > > Nutch 1.3-dev seems to have changed its tstamp field from a long to a > properly formatted Solr readable date/time but the example Solr schema for > Nutch still configures the tstamp field as a long. This results in a > formatted date/time in a long field, which i think should not be allowed > in the first place by Solr. > > <long name="tstamp">2011-04-19T08:16:31.675Z</long> > > While the above is strange enough, i only found out it's all wrong when > using the javabin format. The following query will throw an exception > while using XML response writer works find and returns the tstamp as long > but formatted as a proper date/time. > > javabin: > > curl > "http://localhost:8983/solr/select?fl=id,boost,tstamp,digest&start=0&q=id: > \[*+TO+*\]&wt=javabin&rows=2&version=1" > > Apr 19, 2011 10:34:50 AM > org.apache.solr.request.BinaryResponseWriter$Resolver getDoc > WARNING: Error reading a field from document : > SolrDocument[{digest=7ff92a31c58e43a34fd45bc6d87cda03}] > java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: > "2011-04-19T08:16:31.675Z" at > java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:4 > 8) at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:419) > at java.lang.Long.valueOf(Long.java:525) > at org.apache.solr.schema.LongField.toObject(LongField.java:82) > at org.apache.solr.schema.LongField.toObject(LongField.java:33) > at > org.apache.solr.request.BinaryResponseWriter$Resolver.getDoc(BinaryResponse > Writer.java:148) at > org.apache.solr.request.BinaryResponseWriter$Resolver.writeDocList(BinaryRe > sponseWriter.java:124) at > org.apache.solr.request.BinaryResponseWriter$Resolver.resolve(BinaryRespons > eWriter.java:88) at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeVal(JavaBinCodec.java:143) > at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeNamedList(JavaBinCodec.java:1 > 33) at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeKnownType(JavaBinCodec.java:2 > 21) at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeVal(JavaBinCodec.java:138) > at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.marshal(JavaBinCodec.java:87) > at > org.apache.solr.request.BinaryResponseWriter.write(BinaryResponseWriter.jav > a:48) at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.writeResponse(SolrDispatchFilter > .java:322) at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java > :254) more trace from Jetty > > Here's the wt=xml working fine and showing output for the tstamp field: > > markus@midas:~$ curl > "http://localhost:8983/solr/select?fl=id,boost,tstamp,digest&start=0&q=id: > \[*+TO+*\]&wt=xml&rows=2&version=1" > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <response> > <responseHeader><status>0</status><QTime>17</QTime> > <lst name="params"> > <str name="fl">id,boost,tstamp,digest</str> > <str name="start">0</str> > <str name="q">id:[* TO *]</str> > <str name="wt">xml</str> > <str name="rows">2</str> > <str name="version">1</str>< > /lst></responseHeader> > <result name="response" numFound="2" start="0"> > <doc> > <str name="digest">478e77f99f7005ae71aa92a879be2fd4</str> > <str name="id">idfield</str> > <long name="tstamp">2011-04-19T08:16:31.689Z</long> > </doc> > <doc> > <str name="digest">7ff92a31c58e43a34fd45bc6d87cda03</str> > <str name="id">idfield</str> > <long name="tstamp">2011-04-19T08:16:31.675Z</long> > </doc> > </result> > > > Cheers, -- Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17 050-8536620 / 06-50258350
