I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2503 .
Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ (11/05/06 20:15), Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to use dynamicField in feature-field mapping of uima update > processor. It doesn't seem to be acceptable currently. Is it a bad idea > in terms of use of uima? If it is not so bad, I'd like to try a patch. > > Background: > > Because my uima annotator can generate many types of named entity from > a text, I don't want to implement so many types, but one type "NamedEntity": > > <typeSystemDescription> > <types> > <typeDescription> > <name>com.rondhuit.uima.next.NamedEntity</name> > <description/> > <supertypeName>uima.tcas.Annotation</supertypeName> > <features> > <featureDescription> > <name>name</name> > <description/> > <rangeTypeName>uima.cas.String</rangeTypeName> > </featureDescription> > <featureDescription> > <name>entity</name> > <description/> > <rangeTypeName>uima.cas.String</rangeTypeName> > </featureDescription> > </features> > </typeDescription> > </types> > </typeSystemDescription> > > sample extracted named entities: > > name="PERSON", entity="Barack Obama" > name="TITLE", entity="the President" > > Now, I'd like to map these named entities to Solr fields like this: > > PERSON_S:"Barack Obama" > TITLE_S:"the President" > > Because the type of name (PERSON, TITLE, etc.) can be so many, > I'd like to use dynamicField *_s. And where * is replaced by the name > feature of NamedEntity. > > I think this is natural requirement from Solr view point, but I'm > not sure my uima annotator implementation is correct or not. In other > words, should I implement many types for each entity types? > (e.g. PersonEntity, TitleEntity, ... instead of NamedEntity) > > Thank you! > > Koji
