On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>> To be clear, I'm asking that Yonik revert his commit from yesterday >> (rev 1103444), where he added "text_nwd" fieldType and dynamic fields >> *_nwd to the example schema.xml. > > So... your position is that until the "text" fieldType is changed to > support non-whitespace-delimited languages better, that > no other fieldType should be changed/added to better support > non-whitespace-delimited languages? No, that's not my position at all. My position is: please don't suddenly commit changes, with "your way", while we're still discussing how to solve the issue. That's not the Apache way. This applies in general, not just this case (fixing Solr's out-of-the-box behavior with non-whitespace languages). So, it could very well be, after we iterate on SOLR-2519, that we all agree your baby step is great, in which case let's go forward with that. But we should all come to some consensus about that before you suddenly commit. > Man, that seems political, not technical. I'm sorry you feel that way, but it's important to me that we all follow the Apache way here. I feel this will only make our community stronger. It's also important that any time another committer is uncomfortable with what just got committed, and asks for a revert, that it *not* be a big deal. It's not political, it was just a mistake and the revert is quick and painless. We are commit-then-review here, and if someone is uncomfortable, they should say so and whoever committed should simply revert it and re-iterate. This should be a simple & free tool for all of us to use. > Whatever... I'll "revert". Thank you. Mike
