Hi Erick, thanks a lot! This looks like a good idea: Our queries with the "changeable" fields fits the join-idea from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272 because - we do not need relevance ranking - we can separate in a conjunction of a query with the "changeable" fields and our other "stable" fields So we can use something like q=stablefields:query1&fq={!join from=changeable_fields_doc_id to:stable_fields_doc_id}changeablefields:query2
Only disprofit from the solution with ParallelReader is, that our stored fields and vector terms will be divided on two lucene-docs, which is ok in our use-case. Best regards Karsten in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Update-some-fields-for-all-documents-LUCENE-1879-vs-ParallelReader-amp-FilterIndex-td3215398.html -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 22:11:08 -0400 > Von: Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Update some fields for all documents: LUCENE-1879 vs. > ParallelReader &.FilterIndex > Hmmm, the only thing that comes to mind is the "join" feature being added > to > Solr 4.x, but I confess I'm not entirely familiar with that functionality > so > can't tell if it really solver your problem. > > Other than that I'm out of ideas, but the again it's late and I'm tired so > maybe I'm not being very creative <G>... > > Best > Erick > On Aug 3, 2011 11:40 AM, <karsten-s...@gmx.de> wrote:
