Interesting. Do you make a symlink to the indexes or is the whole Solr directory on SSD?
thanks, Gerard Op 23 aug. 2011, om 12:53 heeft Peter Sturge het volgende geschreven: > Just to add a few cents worth regarding SSD... > > We use Vertex SSD drives for storing indexes, and wow, they really > scream compared to SATA/SAS/SAN. As we do some heavy commits, it's the > commit times where we see the biggest performance boost. > In tests, we found that locally attached 15k SAS drives are the next > best for performance. SANs can work well, but should be FibreChannel. > IP-based SANs are ok, as long they're not heavily taxed by other, > non-Solr disk I/O. > NAS is far and away the poorest performing - not recommended for real indexes. > > HTH, > Peter > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rich Cariens <richcari...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ahoy ahoy! >> >> Does anyone have any experiences or stories they can share with the list >> about how SSDs impacted search performance for better or worse? >> >> I found a Lucene SSD performance benchmark >> doc<http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/SSD_performance?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=combined-disk-ssd.pdf>but >> the wiki engine is refusing to let me view the attachment (I get "You >> are not allowed to do AttachFile on this page."). >> >> Thanks in advance! >> > >
