Thanks for the reply. As far as #1, my table that I'm indexing via DIH has a PK field, generated by a sequence, so there are records with ID of 1, 2, 3, etc. That same id is the one I use in my unique id field in the document (<uniqueKey>ID</uniqueID>).
I've noticed that the table has, say, 10 rows. My index only has 8. I don't know why that is, but I'd like to figure out which records are missing and add them (and hopefully understand why they weren't added in the first place). I was just wondering if there was some way to compare the two as part of a sql query, but on reflection, it does seem like an absurd request, so I apologize; I think what I'll have to do is write a solrj program that gets every ID in the table, then does a search on that ID in the index, and add the ones that are missing. Regarding the second item, yes, it's crazy but I'm not sure what to do; there really are that many options and some searches will be extremely specific, yet broad enough in terms for this to be a problem. -----Original Message----- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:55 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Two unrelated questions for <1> I don't quite get what you're driving at. Your DIH query assigns the uniqueKey, it's not like it's something auto-generated. Perhaps a concrete example would help. <2> There's a limit you can adjust that defaults to 1024 (maxBooleanClauses in solrconfig.xml). You can bump this very high, but you're right, if anyone actually does something absurd it'll slow *that* query down. But just bumping this query higher won't change performance absent someone actually putting a ton of items in it... Best Erick On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Olson, Ron <rol...@lbpc.com> wrote: > Hi all- > > I'm not sure if I should break this out into two separate questions to the > list for searching purposes, or if one is more acceptable (don't want to > flood). > > I have two (hopefully) straightforward questions: > > 1. Is it possible to expose the unique ID of a document to a DIH query? The > reason I want to do this is because I use the unique ID of the row in the > table as the unique ID of the Lucene document, but I've noticed that the > counts of documents doesn't match the count in the table; I'd like to add > these rows and was hoping to avoid writing a custom SolrJ app to do it. > > 2. Is there any limit to the number of conditions in a Boolean search? We're > working on a new project where the user can choose either, for example, "Ford > Vehicles", in which case I can simply search for "Ford", but if the user > chooses specific makes and models, then I have to say something like "Crown > Vic OR Focus OR Taurus OR F-150", etc., where they could theoretically choose > every model of Ford ever made except one. This could lead to a *very* large > query, and was worried both that it was even possible, but also the impact on > performance. > > > Thanks, and I apologize if this really should be two separate messages. > > Ron > > DISCLAIMER: This electronic message, including any attachments, files or > documents, is intended only for the addressee and may contain CONFIDENTIAL, > PROPRIETARY or LEGALLY PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying or > distribution of this message or any of the information included in or with it > is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message > in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and > permanently delete and destroy this message and its attachments, along with > any copies thereof. This message does not create any contractual obligation > on behalf of the sender or Law Bulletin Publishing Company. > Thank you. > DISCLAIMER: This electronic message, including any attachments, files or documents, is intended only for the addressee and may contain CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY or LEGALLY PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message or any of the information included in or with it is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete and destroy this message and its attachments, along with any copies thereof. This message does not create any contractual obligation on behalf of the sender or Law Bulletin Publishing Company. Thank you.
