Hi Fred,

ok, it's a strange behavior with same queries.
Another questions:
-which solr version?
-do you indexing during your load test? (because of index rebuilt)
-do you replicate your index?

Regards
Vadim



2011/9/28 Frederik Kraus <frederik.kr...@gmail.com>

> Hi Vladim,
>
> the thing is, that those exact same queries, that take longer during a load
> test, perform just fine when executed at a slower request rate and are also
> random, i.e. there is no pattern in bad/slow queries.
>
> My first thought was some kind of contention and/or connection starvation
> for the internal shard communication?
>
> Fred.
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011 um 13:18 schrieb Vadim Kisselmann:
>
> > Hi Fred,
> > analyze the queries which take longer.
> > We observe our queries and see the problems with q-time with queries
> which
> > are complex, with phrase queries or queries which contains numbers or
> > special characters.
> > if you don't know it:
> >
> http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search/tuning-search-performance
> > Regards
> > Vadim
> >
> >
> > 2011/9/28 Frederik Kraus <frederik.kr...@gmail.com (mailto:
> frederik.kr...@gmail.com)>
> >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > I am experiencing a strange issue doing some load tests. Our setup:
> > >
> > > - 2 server with each 24 cpu cores, 130GB of RAM
> > > - 10 shards per server (needed for response times) running in a single
> > > tomcat instance
> > > - each query queries all 20 shards (distributed search)
> > >
> > > - each shard holds about 1.5 mio documents (small shards are needed due
> to
> > > rather complex queries)
> > > - all caches are warmed / high cache hit rates (99%) etc.
> > >
> > >
> > > Now for some reason we cannot seem to fully utilize all CPU power (no
> disk
> > > IO), ie. increasing concurrent users doesn't increase CPU-Load at a
> point,
> > > decreases throughput and increases the response times of the individual
> > > queries.
> > >
> > > Also 1-2% of the queries take significantly longer: avg somewhere at
> 100ms
> > > while 1-2% take 1.5s or longer.
> > >
> > > Any ideas are greatly appreciated :)
> > >
> > > Fred.
>
>

Reply via email to