Ok this is a good news ! I will integrate the jar and test the feature :) Only one question regarding the indexing process in solrj. We could index the location data in format : lat,lon in the geohash field? Or we must encode lan & lon in the geohash string and then index the encoded string?
Thank you 2011/9/29 Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> > > On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > > > Sorry David, probably I misunderstood your reply, what do you mean? > > > > I'm using Lucid Work Enterprise 1.8, and, as I know , it includes > geohashes > > patch. > > Solr 3x, trunk, and I suspect Lucid Works Enterprise 2.0 (doubtful 1.8)) > supports this: > <fieldtype name="geohash" class="solr.GeoHashField"/> > That is not "the patch" -- SOLR-2155, that is the standard built-in geo > support in Solr 3x. > > The SOLR-2155 patch is a superset (i.e. extends) that field, adding more > capability. Are you telling me LWE includes SOLR-2155? Can you point to > proof of that please? If it did, then you wouldn't be getting that > FieldCache error due to multi-value since SOLR-2155 definitely supports > multi-value. > > You may have luck putting my SOLR-2155 compiled plugin jar in LWE 1.8 > according to the instructions I provide; I don't know. > > > I have to index a multivalued location field and I have to make location > > queries on it! > > So I figured to use the geohash type ... > > Any hint about indexing and searching on a multivalued geohash field? > > > > > > 2011/9/29 Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> > > > >> Hi Alessandro. > >> > >> I can't think of any good reason anyone would use the geohash field type > >> that is a part of Solr today. If you are shocked I would say that, keep > in > >> mind the work I've done with geohashes is an extension of what's in > Solr, > >> it's not what's in Solr today. Recently I ported SOLR-2155 to Solr 3x, > and > >> in a way that does NOT require that you patch Solr. I attached it to the > >> issue just now. > >> > >> ~ David Smiley > >> > >> On Sep 29, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> I have already read the topics in the mailing list that are regarding > >>> spatial search, but I haven't found an answer ... > >>> I have to index a multivalued field of type : "geohash" via solrj. > >>> Now I build a string with the lat and lon comma separated ( like > >>> 54.569468,67.58494 ) and index it in the geohash field. > >>> The indexing process seems to work , but when I try a spatial search, > >> Solr > >>> returns me an exception with fieldcache on multivalued field. > >>> > >>> I'm using Lucid Work enterprise 1.8 , and , as I know , it should be > >>> integrated with this patch ( > >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994256#comment-12994256 > >>> ). > >>> > >>> Am I indexing wrong? Am I missing something? > >>> The type of my spatial field is geohash ... > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> > >>> -- > >>> ------------------------------- > >>> Alessandro Benedetti > >>> > >>> Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------- > > > > Benedetti Alessandro > > Personal Page: http://tigerbolt.altervista.org > > > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright > > In the forests of the night, > > What immortal hand or eye > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" > > > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England > > -- -------------------------- Benedetti Alessandro Personal Page: http://tigerbolt.altervista.org "Tyger, tyger burning bright In the forests of the night, What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
