One of the values of people reading docs for the first time is that they uncover less-than-clear issues. It's even more valuable if they update the docs, so please feel free to!
Best Erick On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Christopher Gross <cogr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah! That all makes sense. The example on the SpacialSearchDev page > should have that bit added in! > > I'm back in business now, thanks Yonik! > > -- Chris > > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >> Oops, didn't mean for this conversation to leave the mailing lists. >> >> OK, so your lat and lon types were being stored as text but not >> indexed (hence no search matches). >> A dynamic field of "*" does tend to hide bugs/problems ;-) >> >>> So should I have another for _latLon? Would it look like: >>> <dynamicField name="*_latLon" type="double" indexed="true" stored="true"/> >> >> Yep. It shouldn't be stored though (unless you just want to verify >> for debugging). >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Christopher Gross <cogr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Yonik. >>> >>> I never made a dynamicField definition for _latLon ... I was following >>> the examples on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearchDev, so I >>> just added the field type definition, then the field in the list of >>> fields. I wasn't aware that I had to do anything else. The only >>> dynamic that I have is: >>> <dynamicField name="*" type="text" indexed="false" stored="true" >>> multiValued="true"/> >>> >>> So should I have another for _latLon? Would it look like: >>> <dynamicField name="*_latLon" type="double" indexed="true" stored="true"/> >>> >>> -- Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Yonik Seeley >>> <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Christopher Gross <cogr...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Yonik. >>>>> >>>>> I'm having more of a problem now... >>>>> I made the following lines in my schema.xml (in the appropriate places): >>>>> >>>>> <fieldType name="location" class="solr.LatLonType" >>>>> subFieldSuffix="_latLon"/> >>>>> >>>>> <field name="point" type="location" indexed="true" stored="true" >>>>> required="false"/> >>>>> >>>>> I have data (did a q=*:*, found one with a point): >>>>> <str name="point">48.306074,14.286293</str> >>>>> <arr name="point_0_latLon"> >>>>> <str>48.306074</str> >>>>> </arr> >>>>> <arr name="point_1_latLon"> >>>>> <str>14.286293</str> >>>>> </arr> >>>>> >>>>> I've tried to do a bbox: >>>>> q=*:*&fq=point:[30.0,10.0%20TO%2050.0,20.0] >>>>> q=*:*&fq={!bbox}&sfield=point&pt=48,14&d=50 >>>>> >>>>> And neither of those seem to find the point... >>>> >>>> Hmmm, what's the dynamicField definition for _latLon? Is it indexed? >>>> If you add debugQuery=true, you should be able to see the underlying >>>> range queries for your explicit range query. >>>> >>>> -Yonik >>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>> >>> >> >
