Maybe you should index your values differently? Here is what Lucene's 2.9 javadoc says:
To use this, you must first index the numeric values using NumericField<http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene/document/NumericField.html>(expert: NumericTokenStream<http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene/analysis/NumericTokenStream.html>). If your terms are instead textual, you should use TermRangeQuery<http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/TermRangeQuery.html>. NumericRangeFilter<http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/NumericRangeFilter.html>is the filter equivalent of this query. Dmitry On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Jay Luker <lb...@reallywow.com> wrote: > I can't get NumericRangeQuery or TermQuery to work on my integer "id" > field. I feel like I must be missing something obvious. > > I have a test index that has only two documents, id:9076628 and > id:8003001. The id field is defined like so: > > <field name="id" type="tint" indexed="true" stored="true" required="true" > /> > > A MatchAllDocsQuery will return the 2 documents, but any queries I try > on the id field return no results. For instance, > > public void testIdRange() throws IOException { > Query q = NumericRangeQuery.newIntRange("id", 1, 10000000, true, true); > System.out.println("query: " + q); > assertEquals(2, searcher.search(q, 5).totalHits); > } > > public void testIdSearch() throws IOException { > Query q = new TermQuery(new Term("id", "9076628")); > System.out.println("query: " + q); > assertEquals(1, searcher.search(q, 5).totalHits); > } > > Both tests fail with totalHits being 0. This is using solr/lucene > trunk, but I tried also with 3.2 and got the same results. > > What could I be doing wrong here? > > Thanks, > --jay >
