Thanks Martijn. I know what you mean, but in my case I want to sort the groups 
using both "sort" keys and then inside each group it should use the 
"group.sort". 

If you take a look at the query you will see both regular sorting keys 
&sort=location_weight_i desc, weight_i desc. The issue here is that when does 
the grouping it is seems to be failingl to sort the groups by the second key. 

to clarify: I do understand the use case for the other "group.sort" key and it 
is working just fine. The issue is with the 2nd regular sort key.

Thanks ;)
-- 
Mauro Asprea

E-Mail: mauroasp...@gmail.com
Mobile: +34 654297582
Skype: mauro.asprea



On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Martijn v Groningen wrote:

> Hi Mauro,
> 
> During the first pass search the sort param is used to determine the top N
> groups. Then during the second pass search the documents inside the top N
> groups are sorted using the group.sort parameter. The group.sort doesn't
> change how the groups them self are sorted.
> 
> Martijn
> 
> On 11 January 2012 08:03, Mauro Asprea <mauroasp...@gmail.com 
> (mailto:mauroasp...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> 
> > Hi, I'm having some issues trying to sort my grouped results by more than
> > one field. If I use just one, independently of which I use it just work
> > fine (I mean it sorts).
> > 
> > I have a case that the first sorting key is equal for all the head docs of
> > each group, so I expect to return the groups sorted by its second sorting
> > key. But its not the case. Only sorts using the first key no matter what.
> > 
> > This is my query:
> > fq=type:Movie&fq={!tag=cg01w4p3bcj3}date_start_dt:[2012\-01\-11T06\:47\:38Z
> > TO 2012\-01\-12T08\:59\:59Z]&fq=event_id_i:[1 TO *]&sort=location_weight_i
> > desc, weight_i desc&q="Village Avellaneda"&fl=* score&qf=name_texts
> > location_name_text&defType=dismax&start=0&rows=12&group=true&group.field=event_id_str_s&group.field=location_name_str_s&group.sort=date_start_dt
> > asc&group.limit=10&group.limit=1&facet=true&facet.query={!ex=cg01w4p3bcj3}date_start_dt:[2012\-01\-11T06\:47\:38Z
> > TO
> > 2012\-01\-12T08\:59\:59Z]&facet.query={!ex=cg01w4p3bcj3}date_start_dt:[2012\-01\-12T09\:00\:00Z
> > TO
> > 2012\-01\-13T08\:59\:59Z]&facet.query={!ex=cg01w4p3bcj3}date_start_dt:[2012\-01\-13T21\:00\:00Z
> > TO
> > 2012\-01\-16T08\:59\:59Z]&facet.query={!ex=cg01w4p3bcj3}date_start_dt:[2012\-01\-11T06\:47\:38Z
> > TO
> > 2012\-01\-18T12\:47\:38Z]&facet.query={!ex=cg01w4p3bcj3}date_start_dt:[2012\-01\-11T06\:47\:38Z
> > TO 2012\-02\-10T12\:47\:38Z]
> > 
> > Using the last Solr release 3.5
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > --
> > Mauro Asprea
> > 
> > E-Mail: mauroasp...@gmail.com (mailto:mauroasp...@gmail.com)
> > Mobile: +34 654297582
> > Skype: mauro.asprea
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> 
> Martijn van Groningen 

Reply via email to