Just to play safe here, can you double check that the reversing is not any
more the case by issuing a query through the admin analysis page?

Dmitry

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Shyam Bhaskaran <
shyam.bhaska...@synopsys.com> wrote:

> Hi Francois,
>
> I understand that disabling of ReversedWildcardFilterFactory has improved
> the performance.
>
> But I am puzzled over how the leading wild card search like *lock is
> working even though I have now disabled the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory
> and the indexes have been created without ReversedWildcardFilter ?
>
> How does reverse indexing work even after disabling
> ReversedWildcardFilterFactory?
>
> Can anyone explain me how this feature is working.
>
> -Shyam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: François Schiettecatte [mailto:fschietteca...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:49 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
>
> Using ReversedWildcardFilterFactory will double the size of your
> dictionary (more or less), maybe the drop in performance that you are
> seeing is a result of that?
>
> François
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Shyam Bhaskaran wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > For reverse indexing we are using the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory on
> Solr 4.0
> >
> >
> > <filter class="solr.ReversedWildcardFilterFactory" withOriginal="true"
> >
> > maxPosAsterisk="3" maxPosQuestion="2" maxFractionAsterisk="0.33"/>
> >
> >
> > ReversedWildcardFilterFactory was helping us to perform leading wild
> card searches like *lock.
> >
> > But it was observed that the performance of the searches was not good
> after introducing ReversedWildcardFilterFactory filter.
> >
> > Hence we disabled ReversedWildcardFilterFactory filter and re-created
> the indexes and this time we found the performance of Solr query to be
> faster.
> >
> > But surprisingly it is observed that leading wild card searches were
> still working inspite of disabling the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory filter.
> >
> >
> > This behavior is puzzling everyone and wanted to know how this behavior
> of reverse indexing works?
> >
> > Can anyone share with me on this Solr behavior.
> >
> > -Shyam
> >
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Dmitry Kan

Reply via email to