Hi Param Yes, refactoring the various example schema.xml's is what i have been doing up to now. The end results is usually quite verbose with a lot of redundancy. What is the most compact possible schema.xml?
Thanks for the link! F On 25. jan. 2012, at 17:31, "Sethi, Parampreet" <parampreet.se...@teamaol.com> wrote: > Hi Fergus, > > The schema.xml has declaration of fields as well as analyzers/tokenizers > which are required as per the application demand. The easiest way is to > modify the schema.xml file which is delivered with > <apache_solr>/example/solr/conf. > > In case you are looking for setting up Solr in front of database with > minimal manipulation of DB data, you can check it here > http://www.params.me/2011/03/configure-apache-solr-14-with-mysql.html. I > am using this setup in of my applications in production. > > -param > > On 1/25/12 11:10 AM, "Fergus McDowall" <fergusmcdow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it do-able/sensible to build a schema.xml from the ground up? >> >> Say that you are feeding the results of a database query into solr >> containing the fields id(int), title(varchar), description(varchar), >> pub_date(date) and tags(varchar) >> >> What would be the simplest schema.xml that could support this structure >> in Solr? >> >> Fergus >
