OK, thanks Erick. Then I won't touch it. I was just wondering, if it would make sense. But on the other hand the schema.xml is also replicated in my setup, so maybe it's really confusing.
Thanks Daniel On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > I think it would be easy to get confused about what > was where, resulting in hard-to-track bugs because > the config file wasn't what you were expecting. I also > don't understand why you think this is desirable. > There might be an infinitesimal savings in memory, > due to not instantiating one analysis chain, but I'm not > even sure about that. > > The savings is so tiny that the increased risk of > messing up seems far too high a price to pay. > > Best > Erick > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Brügge > <daniel.brue...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am using a 'text_general' fieldType (class = solr.TextField) in my > > schema. And I have a master/slave setup, > > where I index on the master and read from the slaves. In the text_general > > field I am using 2 analyzers. One for > > indexing and one for querying with stopword-filters. > > > > What I am thinking is if it would make sense to have a different schema > on > > the master than on the slave? So just the > > index-analyzer on the master's schema and the query-analyzer on the > slave's > > schema? > > > > > > <fieldType name="text_general" class="solr.TextField" > > positionIncrementGap="100"> > > <analyzer type="index"> > > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> > > <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" > > words="stopwords.txt, stopwords_en.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true" > /> > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > > </analyzer> > > <analyzer type="query"> > > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> > > <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" > > words="stopwords.txt, stopwords_en.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true" > /> > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > > </analyzer> > > </fieldType> > > > > What do you think? > > > > Thanks & best regards > > > > Daniel >
