probably, and besides that, how can I use the features that SolrCloud provides (i.e. high availability and distribution)?
The other solution would be to use SolrCloud and keep all of the users' information in single collection and use NRT. But on the other hand the frequency of updates on that big collection will be high. Do you think it makes sense? On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Glen Newton <glen.new...@gmail.com> wrote: > millions of cores will not work... > ...yet. > > -glen > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Lan <dung....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Solr has no limitation on the number of cores. It's limited by your > hardware, > > inodes and how many files you could keep open. > > > > I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same > hardware > > limits. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813511.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > - > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ > - > -- Alireza Salimi Java EE Developer
