second mean is 48.05%... 2012/3/9 Raimon Bosch <raimon.bo...@gmail.com>
> The answer is so easy. Just need to create an index with each visit. In > this way I could use faceted date search to create time statistics. > > "flats for rent new york" at 1/12/2011 => bounce_rate=48.6% > "flats for rent new york" at 1/1/2012 => bounce_rate=49.7% > "flats for rent new york" at 1/2/2012 => bounce_rate=46.4% > > date:[1/12/2011 - 1/1/2012] > "flats for rent new york" at 1/12/2011 => bounce_rate=48.6% > "flats for rent new york" at 1/1/2012 => bounce_rate=49.7% > mean=49.15% > > date:[1/1/2012 - 1/2/2012] > "flats for rent new york" at 1/1/2012 => bounce_rate=49.7% > "flats for rent new york" at 1/2/2012 => bounce_rate=46.4% > mean=49.05% > > With my initial approach I would save some disk and memory space. I'm > still wondering if it is possible. > > 2012/2/27 Raimon Bosch <raimon.bo...@gmail.com> > >> >> Anyone up to provide an answer? >> >> The idea is have a kind of CustomInteger compound by an array of >> timestamps. The value shown in this field would be based in the date range >> that you're sending. >> >> Biggest problem will be that this field would be in all the documents on >> your solr index so you need to calculate this number in real-time. >> >> >> 2012/2/26 Raimon Bosch <raimon.bo...@gmail.com> >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Today I was playing with StatsComponent just to extract some statistics >>> from my index. I'm using a solr index to store user searches. Basically >>> what I did is to aggregate data from accesslog into my solr index. So now I >>> can see average bounce rate for a group of user searches and see which ones >>> are performing better in google. >>> >>> Now I would like to see the evolution of this stats throught time. For >>> that I would need to have a field with a different values throught time i.e. >>> >>> "flats for rent new york" at 1/12/2011 => bounce_rate=48.6% >>> "flats for rent new york" at 1/1/2012 => bounce_rate=49.7% >>> "flats for rent new york" at 1/2/2012 => bounce_rate=46.4% >>> >>> There is any solr type field that could fit to solve this? >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Raimon Bosch. >>> >> >> >
