Hi, thanks for you advice. Do you have any documentation on that? I'm not sure, how and where to configure this stuff and what impact it has.
Thans, Ramo -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry....@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 16:21 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: Performance (responsetime) on request you can optimize the documentCache by setting maxSize to some decent value, like 2000. Also configure some meaningful warming queries in the solrconfig. When increasing the cache size, monitor the RAM usage, as that can starting increasing as well. Do you / would you need to use filter queries? Those can speed up search as well through the usage of filterCache. Dmitry On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Ramo Karahasan < ramo.karaha...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > this are the results form the solr admin page for cache: > > > name: queryResultCache > class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache > version: 1.0 > description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512) > stats: lookups : 376 > hits : 246 > hitratio : 0.65 > inserts : 130 > evictions : 0 > size : 130 > warmupTime : 0 > cumulative_lookups : 2994 > cumulative_hits : 1934 > cumulative_hitratio : 0.64 > cumulative_inserts : 1060 > cumulative_evictions : 409 > > name: fieldCache > class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrFieldCacheMBean > version: 1.0 > description: Provides introspection of the Lucene FieldCache, this is > **NOT** a cache that is managed by Solr. > stats: entries_count : 0 > insanity_count : 0 > > name: documentCache > class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache > version: 1.0 > description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512) > stats: lookups : 13416 > hits : 11787 > hitratio : 0.87 > inserts : 1629 > evictions : 1089 > size : 512 > warmupTime : 0 > cumulative_lookups : 100012 > cumulative_hits : 86959 > cumulative_hitratio : 0.86 > cumulative_inserts : 13053 > cumulative_evictions : 11914 > > name: fieldValueCache > class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache > version: 1.0 > description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=10000, initialSize=10, > minSize=9000, acceptableSize=9500, cleanupThread=false) > stats: lookups : 0 > hits : 0 > hitratio : 0.00 > inserts : 0 > evictions : 0 > size : 0 > warmupTime : 0 > cumulative_lookups : 0 > cumulative_hits : 0 > cumulative_hitratio : 0.00 > cumulative_inserts : 0 > cumulative_evictions : 0 > > name: filterCache > class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache > version: 1.0 > description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512, > minSize=460, acceptableSize=486, cleanupThread=false) > stats: lookups : 0 > hits : 0 > hitratio : 0.00 > inserts : 0 > evictions : 0 > size : 0 > warmupTime : 0 > cumulative_lookups : 0 > cumulative_hits : 0 > cumulative_hitratio : 0.00 > cumulative_inserts : 0 > cumulative_evictions : 0 > > > Is there something tob e optimized? > > Thanks, > Ramo > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry....@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 15:06 > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Performance (responsetime) on request > > If you look at solr admin page / statistics of cache, you could check > the evictions of different types of cache. If some of them are larger > than zero, try minimizing them by increasing the corresponding cache > params in the solrconfig.xml. > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ramo Karahasan < > ramo.karaha...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > i've got two virtual machines in the same subnet at the same > > hostingprovider. On one machine my webapplication is running, on the > > second a solr instance. In solr I use the following > > > > > > > > <fieldType name="text_auto" class="solr.TextField"> > > > > <analyzer type="index"> > > > > <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>--> > > > > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> > > > > <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2" > > maxGramSize="25" > > /> > > > > > > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > > > > <!--<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1" > > maxGramSize="25" />--> > > > > </analyzer> > > > > <analyzer type="query"> > > > > <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" />--> > > > > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> > > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > > > > <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2" > > maxGramSize="25" > > /> > > > > </analyzer> > > > > </fieldType> > > > > > > > > > > > > <fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField" > > positionIncrementGap="100"> > > > > <analyzer> > > > > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > > > > <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" generateWordParts="1" > > generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1" > > catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/> > > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > > > > </analyzer> > > > > </fieldType> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I search from my webapplication in my autosuggest box, I get > > response times of ~500ms per request. Is it possible to "tune" solr, > > so that I get faster results? > > > > I have no special cache configuration, nor I don't know what to > > configure here. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ramo > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Dmitry Kan > >
