But if you have that "score" in a field, you could use that field as part of a function-query instead of directly sorting on it, that would mix this "score" with the score calculated with other fields.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Darren Govoni <dar...@ontrenet.com> wrote: > Yeah, I guess that would work. I wasn't sure if it would change relative > to other documents. But if it were to be combined with other fields, > that approach may not work because the calculation wouldn't include the > scoring for other parts of the query. So then you have the dynamic score > and what to do with it. > > On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:29 -0300, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > > Can't you simply calculate that at index time and assign the result to a > > field, then sort by that field. > > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Darren Govoni <dar...@ontrenet.com> > wrote: > > > > > I'm going to try index time per-field boosting and do the boost > > > computation at index time and see if that helps. > > > > > > On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 10:08 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a situation I want to re-score document relevance. > > > > > > > > Let's say I have two fields: > > > > > > > > text: The quick brown fox jumped over the white fence. > > > > terms: fox fence > > > > > > > > Now my queries come in as: > > > > > > > > terms:[* TO *] > > > > > > > > and Solr scores them on that field. > > > > > > > > What I want is to rank them according to the distribution of field > > > > "terms" within field "text". Which is a per document calculation. > > > > > > > > Can this be done with any kind of dismax? I'm not searching for known > > > > terms at query time. > > > > > > > > If not, what is the best way to implement a custom scoring handler to > > > > perform this calculation and re-score/sort the results? > > > > > > > > thanks for any tips!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
