Not sure if this got lost in the shuffle, were there any thoughts on this?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Given that in a distributed environment the docids are not guaranteed > to be the same across shards should the sorting use the uniqueId field > as the tie breaker by default? > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'll try to dig for the JIRA. Also I'm assuming this could happen on >>> any sort, not just score correct? Meaning if we sorted by a date >>> field and there were duplicates in that date field order wouldn't be >>> guaranteed for the same reasons right? >> >> Correct - internal docid is the tiebreaker for all sorts. >> >> -Yonik >> lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference. >> Boston May 7-10
