You *could* do it by making one and only one solr document for each
clothing item, then just have the front end render all the sizes and
colors available for that item as size/color pickers on the product
page.  You can add all the colors and sized to the one document in the
index so they are searchable also, but the caveat is that they won't
show up as a facet.  This is just one simple approach.

-----Original Message-----
From: danjfoley [mailto:d...@micamedia.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 7:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: how to correctly facet clothing multiple sizes and colors?

I've been searching for a solution to my issue, and this seems to come
closest to it. But not exactly. 

I am indexing clothing. Each article of clothing comes in many sizes and
colors, and can belong to any number of categories. 

For example take the following: I add 6 documents to solr as follows: 

product, color, size, category 

shirt A, red, small, valentines day 
shirt A, red, large, valentines day 
shirt A, blue, small, valentines day 
shirt A, blue, large, valentines day 
shirt A, green, small, valentines day 
shirt A, green, large, valentines day 

I'd like my facet counts to return as follows: 

color 

red (1) 
blue (1) 
green (1) 

size 

small (1) 
large (1) 

category 

valentines day (1) 

But they come back like this: 

color: 
red (2) 
blue (2) 
green (2) 

size: 
small (2) 
large (2) 

category 
valentines day (6) 

I see the group.facet parameter in version 4.0 does exactly this.
However
how can I make this happen now? There are all sorts of ecommerce systems
out
there that facet exactly how i'm asking. i thought solr is supposed to
be
the very best fastest search system, yet it doesn't seem to be able to
facet
correct for items with multiple values? 

Am i indexing my data wrong? 

how can i make this happen?

--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-correctly-facet-clothing-multi
ple-sizes-and-colors-tp3893747p3893747.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to