Erick Erickson wrote > > Ahhh, you need to look down another few lines. When you specify fq, there > should be a section of the debug output like > <arr name="filter_queries"> > . > . > . > </arr> > > where the array is the parsed form of the filter queries. I was thinking > about > comparing that with the parsed form of the "q" parameter in the non-filter > case to see what insight one could gain from that. > >
There is no "filter_queries" section because I do not use an fq in the first two queries. I use one in the combined query, for which you can see the output further below. Erick Erickson wrote > > > But there's already one difference, when you use *, you get > <str name="parsedquery">ID:*</str> > > Is it possible that you have some documents that do NOT have an ID field? > try *:* rather than just *. I'm guessing that your default search field is > ID > and you have some documents without an ID field. Not a good guess if ID > is your <uniqueKey> though...... > > Try q=*:* -ID:* and see if you get 31 docs. > > All the entries have an ID, so q=*:* -ID:* yielded 0 results. The ID could appear multiple times, that is the reason behind grouping of results. Indeed, ID is the default search field. Erick Erickson wrote > > > Also note that if you _have_ specified ID as your <uniqueKey> _but_ you > didn't > re-index afterwards (actually, I'd blow away the entire > <solrhome>/data directory > and restart) you may have stale data in there that allowed documents to > exist > that do not have uniqueKey fields..... > > For Solr's unique id I use a <fieldType name="uuid" class="solr.UUIDField" indexed="true" /> field (which, of course, has a different name than the default search ID), so it should not be a problem. I have re-indexed the data, and I get somewhat a different result. This is the query: http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select?indent=on&version=2.2&q=*:*&fq={!tag=dt}CITY:MILTON&start=0&rows=10&fl=*&wt=&explainOther=&hl.fl=&group=true&group.field=STR_ENTERPRISE_ID&group.truncate=true&facet=true&facet.field={!ex=dt}CITY&facet.missing=true&group.ngroups=true&debugQuery=on And the results as well as the debug information: <lst name="grouped"> <lst name="ID"> <int name="matches">284</int> <int name="ngroups">134</int> <arr name="groups"></arr> ... <lst name="facet_counts"> <lst name="facet_queries"/> <lst name="facet_fields"> <lst name="CITY"> ... <int name="MILTON">89</int> ... <lst name="debug"> <str name="rawquerystring">*:*</str> <str name="querystring">*:*</str> <str name="parsedquery">MatchAllDocsQuery(*:*)</str> <str name="parsedquery_toString">*:*</str> <lst name="explain"></lst> <str name="QParser">LuceneQParser</str> <arr name="filter_queries"> <str>{!tag=dt}CITY:MILTON</str> </arr><arr name="parsed_filter_queries"> <str>CITY:MILTON</str> </arr> <lst name="timing"></lst> </lst> So now fq says: 134 groups with CITY:MILTON and faceted search says: 83 groups with CITY:MILTON. How can I see some information about the grouping in Solr? Thanks Erick! Regards, Tudor -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-results-vs-facets-results-tp3995079p3995388.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
