Hi Rajani,
I'm not really familiar with this paoding tokenizer, but it seems a bit
old. We are using the CJKBigramFilter (like in the example of Solr 4.0
alpha), which should be equivalent or even better and it works.
<analyzer>
<tokenizer class="solr.ICUTokenizerFactory" />
<filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" />
<filter class="solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory" />
<filter class="solr.CJKBigramFilterFactory" />
</analyzer>
Uwe
Am 09.08.2012 06:47, schrieb Rajani Maski:
Hi All,
Any reply on this?
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Rajani Maski <rajinima...@gmail.com
<mailto:rajinima...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
As said in this blog site
<http://java.dzone.com/articles/indexing-chinese-solr> that paoding
analyzer is much better for chinese text, I was trying to implement
it to get accurate results for chinese text.
I followed the instruction specified in the below sites
Site1
<http://androidyou.blogspot.hk/2010/05/chinese-tokenizerlibrary-paoding-with.html>
& Site2
<http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2011/12/23/indexing-chinese-in-solr/>
After Indexing, when I search on same field with same text, no
search results(numFound=0)
And luke tool is not showing up any terms for the field that is
indexed with below field type. Can anyone comment on what is going
wrong?
*_Schema field types for paoding :_*
*1) <fieldType name="paoding" class="solr.TextField"
positionIncrementGap="100" >*
*<analyzer>*
*<tokenizer
class="test.solr.PaodingTokerFactory.PaoDingTokenizerFactory"/>*
*</analyzer>*
*</fieldType>*
And analaysis page results is :
Inline image 2
*2)<fieldType name="paoding_chinese" class="solr.TextField">*
* <analyzer class="net.paoding.analysis.analyzer.PaodingAnalyzer">*
* </analyzer>*
* </fieldType>*
Analysis on the field "paoding_chinese" throws this error
Inline image 3
Thanks & Regards
Rajani
