I found some discussion saying that starting in 3.1, files that you
xinclude with a relative path from something like solrconfig.xml are
relative to the location of the file with the xinclude.
I use a directory structure where solrconfig.xml in the individual core
directory is a symlink to another directory, so that similar cores can
share configs. Currently those xincludes are absolute paths, but when I
move to Solr4, I want to make them relative so that multiple config
structures can coexist. Will a relative xinclude start at the location
of the symlink, or the actual file? I can't try it out at this time,
though I will do so in a few days. If someone happens to know, it would
help me greatly.
I'd like to learn what the community thinks SHOULD happen with a
symlinked xml file that has relative xincludes. Should the includes be
relative to the actual file or the symlink? Is this a question more
suited to the -dev list?
Thanks,
Shawn
