-----Original message----- > From:Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com> > Sent: Thu 08-Nov-2012 15:56 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: positions and qf parameter in (e)dismax > > Sounds like a reasonable request for a new feature to add to Solr. > > Question: Would you want the query to SKIP fields that don't have positions > enabled, or to treat a phrase as discrete terms? Or, is that another option > you might need to control for each field?
In the past it was silently ignored. But another parameter or relying on pf seems more appropriate to me. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -----Original Message----- > From: Markus Jelsma > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 5:01 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: positions and qf parameter in (e)dismax > > Hi, > > We do not want to store positions for some fields or omit term and positions > (or just tf) for other fields. Obviously we don't need/want explicit phrase > matching on the fields we want to configure without positions, but (e)dismax > doesn't let us. All text fields configured in the QF parameter are eligible > for explicit phrase matching and need to have positions. We're looking for a > way to disable what we don't need and prevent Solr from searching fields for > phrases that we don't want to be searched on. > > Essentially we'd want to limit explicit phrase matching to the same fields > configured in pf or have Lucene ignore explicit phrase searching on fields > that have no positions loaded. > > Any ideas to share? > > Thanks, > Markus > >
